At Vitamins & Supplements 365, accuracy and credibility are the foundation of everything we publish. We recognize that when it comes to health, wellness, and supplements, trust is not optional—it is essential. Readers come to us seeking reliable, science-backed information to make informed decisions about their health, and we take that responsibility seriously.
Every article, review, and educational resource undergoes a rigorous fact-checking process before publication. Our commitment is simple: to provide content that is clear, evidence-based, transparent, and regularly updated in line with the latest scientific developments.
This policy explains how our fact-checking works, the safeguards we use to maintain accuracy, and how readers can hold us accountable.
Our Fact-Checking Process
We use a multi-layered approach to ensure accuracy, combining scientific evidence, expert review, editorial oversight, and transparency.
a) Evidence-Based Research
Every article begins with research grounded in credible, authoritative sources. Our writers and editors rely on:
- Peer-reviewed medical journals (PubMed, JAMA, The Lancet, BMJ, etc.)
- Clinical trial databases and meta-analyses
- Medical textbooks used in professional training
- Guidance from trusted organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Cochrane Collaboration, and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH).
We do not rely on anecdotal claims, marketing hype, or low-quality studies. When supplements are discussed, we carefully assess dosages, formulations, and safety profiles as reported in scientific literature.
b) Expert Review
Our editorial process integrates the knowledge of medical professionals, registered dietitians, pharmacists, and experienced health writers. Experts review content for scientific accuracy, balance of perspectives, consistency with current clinical guidelines, and clarity for consumer understanding. When applicable, we also invite external experts to verify specialized content in fields such as cardiology, dermatology, or endocrinology.
c) Clarity and Accessibility
Health information should empower, not overwhelm, readers. We translate complex medical findings into clear, practical explanations while preserving accuracy. We avoid unnecessary jargon, define scientific terms in plain language, and use tables, bullet points, or infographics when appropriate. Our goal is to make content understandable for a general audience without diluting the science.
d) Ongoing Updates
Science is dynamic. What is true today may change as new evidence emerges. For this reason, we routinely review and update older articles, add timestamps so readers know when information was last verified, and revise content whenever guidelines from institutions such as the FDA, WHO, or NIH are updated. This ensures our library remains current and trustworthy.
e) Transparency of Sources
We believe readers should have direct access to the information behind our claims. Citations are provided within articles, linking to original studies or official reports. When research is limited or mixed, we state this clearly, noting that evidence is preliminary. We also differentiate between established facts, emerging research, and expert opinion. This transparency empowers readers to verify claims themselves.
2.Editorial Safeguards
Beyond fact-checking, we apply additional editorial safeguards to ensure our content is reliable and free of hidden influence.
- Independence from Sponsors: Our reviews and recommendations are independent. While we may use affiliate links to support site operations, these do not influence our editorial process. Claims about supplements are based on evidence, not advertising.
- Balanced Presentation: We always present a complete picture, covering benefits supported by research, known limitations and side effects, and situations where evidence is inconclusive. This prevents misleading or one-sided narratives.
- Accuracy Over Speed: Unlike news outlets that rush to break stories, we prioritize accuracy and verification over being first. If evidence is incomplete, we wait until adequate confirmation is available before making health claims.
Reader Feedback and Accountability
We see our readers as active partners in maintaining accuracy.
- Reporting Potential Errors
If you believe any information on our site is inaccurate, outdated, misleading, or missing important context, you can contact us directly at [email protected]. - Correction Process
When feedback is received, our editorial team promptly reviews the claim. If the concern is valid, the article is corrected or updated, and a note may be added acknowledging that corrections were made. This transparent correction process strengthens our credibility. - Commitment to Transparency
We openly acknowledge when errors occur. Our aim is not perfection but constant improvement. Feedback from readers helps us refine and strengthen our resources.
Why Fact-Checking Matters
In today’s digital world, misinformation about supplements and health products is widespread. Unverified claims can lead to wasted money on ineffective supplements, health risks from unsafe dosages or interactions, and false hope in unproven cures. By enforcing strict fact-checking, we ensure our readers make informed, evidence-based decisions that protect both their health and their wallets.
Key Principles of Our Fact-Checking
To summarize, our process is built on five core principles:
- Accuracy: Every fact is verified against reliable scientific sources.
- Clarity: Information is explained in language everyone can understand.
- Balance: Both benefits and risks are covered.
- Transparency: Sources are cited openly and corrections made visibly.
- Accountability: Readers can report errors, and we act promptly.
Example of Our Approach in Practice
To illustrate, consider how we would cover a supplement like Vitamin D. We cite NIH fact sheets and peer-reviewed studies showing its role in bone health and immunity. We present the recommended daily intake from the Institute of Medicine, warn about risks of excessive supplementation citing hypercalcemia case studies, and note where evidence is inconclusive such as Vitamin D and cancer prevention. This balanced, evidence-based style is applied across all supplements and health topics.
Commitment to Continuous Improvement
Fact-checking is not static. As technology evolves, we are exploring AI-assisted literature reviews to scan new studies faster, partnerships with academic institutions for external validation, and reader surveys to identify areas where more clarity is needed. These innovations will help us serve as an even more reliable health resource.
Conclusion
At Vitamins & Supplements 365, our fact-checking policy reflects our dedication to scientific accuracy, editorial integrity, and reader trust. Every article passes through evidence-based research, expert review, and transparent citation before reaching you.
We invite our readers to engage with us, ask questions, and hold us accountable. Together, we can fight misinformation and create a trusted space for health knowledge. If you ever spot a potential error or have concerns about the accuracy of our content, please email us at [email protected]. Your voice helps us stay accurate, transparent, and reliable.